TIPS

Research

Research areas

Formal methods in philosophy and science

Research coordinator: Claudio Calosi

The use of formal methods is widespread in contemporary philosophy and science. Indeed, many core disciplines make heavy use of formal tools – tools borrowed from mathematics, broadly construed. Logic and natural sciences are obvious examples. But metaphysics, epistemology, the philosophy of science, social ontology, the philosophy of perception and value theory are other well-known illustrations. This research area aims at discussing the use of formal methods and their applications both in science and philosophy. Examples range from mereology to topology, from formal theories of location to determination, grounding and dependence to mention a few.

Historical epistemology of artificial intelligence

Research coordinator: Matteo Pasquinelli

The study of the automation of so-called human ‘intelligence’ is not separated from the formalisation and measurement of labour, language, knowledge, and social relations that often predate automation. Research in this area aims at writing a new history of AI as a history of the definitions and metrics of intelligence (in particular algorithmic models) in the context of the evolution of statistics, computer science, digital humanities, and the current AI models of AI. It also aims at building a comparative epistemology of AI that engages with the psychology of learning and development, the historical epistemology of science and technology, and the role of mental models, technical models, and models of the mind in the work of scientists, computer scientists, psychologists and educators.

History and epistemologies of environmental sciences and the Anthropocene

Research coordinator: Giulia Rispoli

This research area contributes to the study and evaluation of the historical, epistemological, and scientific foundations of the Anthropocene, a new geological epoch characterized by the global impact of human activities on the planet. In particular, it focuses on reconstructing the genealogies of two concepts – the "biosphere-geosphere" developed in Russia and Eastern Europe, and the "Earth system" of Western ascendancy – and how they help to reveal different ways in which our planet has been conceived and represented in the 20th century in relation to human influence, becoming an object of global politics. It also explores the multiple dimensions of global scientific cooperation on the biosphere and its entangled relations with policy-making in an international and transnational context.

Natural philosophy and medicine in Early Modern Italy

Research coordinator: Craig Martin

Both natural philosophy and medicine underwent significant changes in early modern Italy as the result of re-evaluations of ancient writings and considerations of historical writings that provided evidence for past natural disasters, meteorological conditions, and the character of disease. Research in this area focuses on epistemology, pedagogy, and observational practices, especially as applied to meteorology, the human body, and diseases.
Planned future research will cover the Renaissance tradition of Hippocratic Epidemics, the impact of Arabic writings on early modern medicine, early modern experiential techniques for developing matter theory, and ideals of progress in early modern medicine.

Philosophy and the uses of science

Research coordinator: Eleonora Montuschi

We send people to the moon, we teach our children that the earth is not flat, we happily submit to laser surgery on our eyes, and we invest heavily in studying the genetic structure of viruses. Clearly, we trust that much of what science teaches and offers is reliable, and so too are many of its predictions or technologies. What is it about science that makes it reliable? Answering this question does not only require an understanding of the epistemological and methodological protocols followed by science in producing its results, but also awareness of the contexts where these protocols are used, including their purposes, functions, and agents. In this research areas the question of the use, and uses, of science is addressed both from the point of view of the producers of scientific knowledge and from that of its social recipients. It also explores the diverse forms of expertise called into play in acquiring such knowledge.

Technoscience and justice in multispecies worlds

Research coordinator: Roberta Raffaetà

This is a cluster area that includes a number of anthropological projects which critically investigate how science is undergoing transformations in relation to social change, ecological crisis and technological revolutions. Its research unit is hosted by NICHE.
This work lies at the intersection of medical anthropology, political ecology and science and technology studies. Key questions refer to what ‘living well’ means in its connection to social justice and in times of ecological transition, and how technoscience articulates it. The methods of inquiry are mainly anthropological, in strong alliance with other disciplines. 

The political epistemology of hydrology

Research coordinator: Pietro Daniel Omodeo

This research area is associated with the UNESCO Chair on “Water Heritage and Sustainable Development” established at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. It focuses on water culture and hydropolitics from the transdisciplinary perspective of historical geo-anthropology – that is, from the viewpoint of the Anthropocene transformation of the planetary ecosystem. In particular, it investigates flows of water, people, knowledge and value-making in connection with aquatic landscapes, such as Venice and its Lagoon. The Chair is active within the programme UNITWIN/UNESCO, which promotes inter-university cooperation and networking (including through collaboration with water museums) by building bridges between academia and civil society.


Research projects

AI MODELS

The Culture of Algorithmic Models: Advancing the Historical Epistemology of Artificial Intelligence

This ERC Consolidator project aims at historicising AI by focusing on the theories and practices of modelling in natural and social science, linguistics and computer science, statistics and digital humanities. It looks at the emergence of the paradigm of AI not as a recent phenomenon but as related to practices of formalisation and measurement of labour, language, knowledge, and nature at large. 

AI MODELS website

Antartic-Ome

Human microbiome transmission in the extreme confined built environment of Antarctica

MUR PNRA (Programma Nazionale di Ricerche in Antartide), 2024-2026
Partners: Trento University (leading), Tuscia University, Ca' Foscari University of Venice

DEED

Democratizing Energy, Energizing Democracy: A deliberative, participatory energy democracy for an inclusive ecological transition

This is a PRIN project, coordinated by University of Rome La Sapienza, dealing with the democratic management of energy transition. Ca’ Foscari unit of research focuses on international political theories on the use of energetic resources and on the issue of expertise and epistocracy applied to the case of energy transition.

DEED website

EarlyGeoPraxis

Positioned Cosmology in Early Modernity: The Geo-Praxis of Water-and-Land Management in Venice

This project has received funding from the Italian Ministry of University and Research under the FARE action. It addresses the cosmological embedment of geological praxis in early modernity by focusing on the ‘water city’, Venice, as a case study for the comprehension of the relationship between nature and civilization.

EarlyGeoPraxis website

Equivalence in Metaphysics

This project, funded by the Swiss National Foundation, deals with the application of tools developed by the literature on formal equivalence to different metaphysical issues such as e.g., theories of persistence, properties, theories and composition to mention a few. The application of such formal tools is also intended to shed new light on the notion of equivalence itself.

HealthXCross

Remaking Health in a Microbial Planet by Crossing Space, Time, Species and Epistemic Cultures

This ERC Starting project is a multi-sited, comparative ethnographic study of how technoscience is reconfiguring biomedicine and biology – and, in turn, social sciences and the same concept of ‘human’ – by connecting microbial data across time, space and species. The project includes a complementary side-project, "SHK_HealthXCross - Microbiome technoscience in Shanghai and Hong Kong in pandemic times. An anthropological study", funded by the MUR FARE (Framework per l'Attrazione e Rafforzamento delle Eccellenze in Italia).

HealthXCross website

ISEED

Inclusive Science and European Democracies

This is an international research project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (2021-2024). Coordinated by Ca’ Foscari, it joins researchers from Italy, France, Poland, Norway, Denmark, Ireland, Spain, Bulgaria, Uruguay and the United Kingdom to learn lessons from citizen science engagement projects and to understand how to involve citizens in democratic practices of participation and deliberation.

ISEED website

Nuclear Anthropocene

Nuclear Winter, Biosphere Modeling, and International Governance

This project, funded by SPIN-Ca’ Foscari, examines the context in which cooperation on Earth system science and modeling for nuclear winter took place at the height of the Cold War, and how it ignited the discussion – in different fields of science, knowledge and culture – about the evolution of the whole Earth into a new geological stage.

Affiliated Centres and Groups

Publications

  • Barchetta, L., Raffaetà, R. (2024). Data as environment, environment as data. One Health in collaborative data-intensive science in Big Data & Society, vol. 11, pp. 1-13 (ISSN 2053-9517).
  • Barrotta, P., Montuschi, E. (2018). Expertise, relevance and types of knowledge. Social Epistemology, 32 (6).
  • Barrotta, P., Gronda, R. (2022). Intelligence and scientific expertise. Synthese 200 (2): 1-19.
  • Bucchi, M. (2017). Credibility, expertise and the challenges of science communication 2.0, Editorial, Public Understanding of Science, 26(8):890-893
  • Calosi, C. (forthcoming). Regions, extensions, distances, diameters. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
  • Cartwright, N., Hardie, J., Montuschi, E., Soleiman,M., Thresher, A.C. (2022). The Tangle of Science. Reliability beyond method, rigour, and objectivity. Oxford University Press.
  • Furman, K. (2023) Beliefs, values and emotions: An interactive approach to distrust in science. Philosophical Psychology, 37 (1). pp. 240-257.
  • Kappel, K. and Zahle, J. (2019). The Epistemic role of science and experts in democracy. In The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology, Peter Graham, Miranda Fricker David Henderson, and Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.). London: Routledge Publishers.
  • Martin, C. (forthcoming). Medicine and the heavens in Padua's Faculty of Arts, 1570-1630 in British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 56, pp. 1-15
  • Omodeo, P. D. (2023). The Invisible Fisherman: The economy of water knowledge in early-modern Venice, Ichthyology in Context (1500-1880), Leiden, Brill, pp. 362-391.
  • Oreskes, N. (2019), Why Trust Science?, Princeton University Press.
  • Pasquinelli, M. (2023). The Eye of the Master. A social history of artificial intelligence, London, Verso Books.
  • Rispoli, G. (2023). The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration in Science and Public Policy.
  • Seckinelgin, H. (2017). The politics of global AIDS: institutionalization of solidarity, exclusion of context. Social Aspects of HIV. Springer International Publishing.
  • Teira, D. (2021). On the Limits of Cultural Relativism as a Debiasing Method. Philosophy of Science, 2021.