MONETARY HISTORY OF THE ANCIENT WORLD
- Academic year
- 2024/2025 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- STORIA DELLA MONETA NEL MONDO ANTICO
- Course code
- FM0543 (AF:533889 AR:300920)
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Educational sector code
- L-ANT/04
- Period
- 2nd Semester
- Where
- VENEZIA
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
It has the purpose to guarantee to the students the advanced knowledge of monetary history in antiquity and ancient numismatics through the in-depth study of research techniques and of a specific topic in the monetary history of the ancient world; the knowledge of the methodology of research in ancient numismatics; the knowledge of the lexicon of the subject. It intends to guarantee the acquisition of cognitive abilities as sketch out a scientific research and practical abilities as be able to hand the results of scientific research over through the scientific communication. The students will develop research and didactical skills in the subject and acquire skills as critical approach during the evaluation of information and news, and understanding of events and cultural processes crucial in the constitution of the occidental identity.
The attainment of these goals assures to the student the cultural, disciplinary, methodological knowledge to enter the world of work in didactical, cultural, divulgation and communication-linked fields, according to his academic curriculum.
Expected learning outcomes
- Knowledge and Understanding: knowledge and understanding of specific problems and themes of monetary history in the ancient world and ancient numismatics; proficiency in analyzing ancient coins; ability to connect theoretical and methodological content to the interpretation of past, present, and future events and processes.
- Applying Knowledge and Understanding: ability to historically contextualize numismatic materials (ancient coins) and to comment on them from the perspective of monetary history and ancient numismatics.
- Making Judgements: ability to read and contextualize previously unknown sources and to discern the peculiarities of specific themes in monetary history and ancient numismatics.
- Communication Skills: ability to communicate the specifics of the discipline using appropriate terminology; ability to convey, argue, and present research findings to various stakeholders and target audiences.
- Learning Skills: ability to apply learning outcomes to unfamiliar contexts and to utilize updated tools and bibliography; ability to engage with seminar topics.
Pre-requirements
Foreign students are invited to contact the course tutor beforehand.
Contents
A specific research topic will be assigned to each participant.
Referral texts
- M. Alram, "The Coinage of the Persian Empire", in William E. Metcalf (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage, Oxford 2012, pp. 61-87
- J. Bodzek, "Remarks on the Origins of Achaemenid Satrapic Coinages" in D. Kašparová (ed.), Folia numismatica 28/1, Supplementum ad Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae sociales XCIX 2014, Brno 2014, pp. 3-10 (available at https://www.academia.edu )
- C. Tuplin, “The changing pattern of Achaemenid imperial coinage”, in P.Bernholz & R.Vaubel (edd.), Explaining Monetary and Financial Innovation (Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London, 2014), 127-168. (available at https://www.academia.edu )
- M.F. Baslez, "La circulation et le rôle des dariques en Grèce d’Europe à la fin du Ve et au IVe siècles", in «Revue des Études Anciennes», 91, 1989, pp. 237–246.
- Further literature will be given in class.
texts for students who cannot get class notes
- M. Alram, "The Coinage of the Persian Empire", in William E. Metcalf (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage, Oxford 2012, pp. 61-87
- J. Bodzek, "Remarks on the Origins of Achaemenid Satrapic Coinages" in D. Kašparová (ed.), Folia numismatica 28/1, Supplementum ad Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae sociales XCIX 2014, Brno 2014, pp. 3-10 (available at https://www.academia.edu )
- C. Tuplin, “The changing pattern of Achaemenid imperial coinage”, in P.Bernholz & R.Vaubel (edd.), Explaining Monetary and Financial Innovation (Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London, 2014), 127-168. (available at https://www.academia.edu )
- M.F. Baslez, "La circulation et le rôle des dariques en Grèce d’Europe à la fin du Ve et au IVe siècles", in «Revue des Études Anciennes», 91, 1989, pp. 237–246.
- I. Carradice, "The ‘regal’ coinage of the Persian Empire", in I. Carradice (Ed.), Coinage and administration in the Athenian and Persian Empires, Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 1987, pp. 73-108. (a copy of this article is avaible on request)
- D. Stronach, "Early Achaemenid coinage: Perspectives from the homeland", «Iranica Antiqua», 24, 1989, pp. 255–279.
- A. Zournatzi, "The Apadana coin hoards, Darius I, and the West", in «American Journal of Numismatics», 15, 2003, pp. 1–28.
All foreign students are invited to contact the course tutor beforehand in order to discuss their study programmes for individual assessment.
Assessment methods
Through these exam the teacher verifies:
1) knowledge: acquisition of fundamental concepts and scientific lexicon of the subject and the methodology of numismatic research;
2) cognitive abilities: the application of the methodology of historical research with particular focus on the use of numismatic sources and on critical approach on bibliography about monetary history of the Middle Ages; the ability of analysis of historical processes related to medieval coinage and economy; practical abilities: identification and cataloguing of medieval artefacts (coins); communicative abilities, for the public history and scientific communication (selecting the contents, the ways of communication, the time)
3) skills: capability to analyze reality and information and to increase critical awareness of peculiarity of each historical period as.for monetary history.
Each category of examination is judged according to a scale of thirty points, and the final mark is the result of the points earned for each examination (60% oral exam; 30% essay, 10% presentation in class).
Assessment Grid:
28-30L: excellent mastery of the topics covered in class and in the textbooks; excellent ability to prioritize information; appropriate use of technical terminology of the discipline;
26-27: good knowledge of the topics covered in class and in the textbooks; good ability to organize and present information; generally correct use of the technical terminology of the discipline;
24-25: fair knowledge of the topics covered in class and in the textbooks; fair ability to organize information; use of technical terminology of the discipline not always correct;
22-23: occasionally superficial and/or incomplete knowledge of the topics covered in class and in the textbooks; presentation not always clear and/or lacking in technical terminology of the discipline;
18-21: occasionally incomplete knowledge of the topics covered in class and in the textbooks, but still sufficient; presentation not clear and/or lacking and/or with scarce use of the technical terminology of the discipline.