THEORY OF LITERATURE
- Academic year
- 2025/2026 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- THEORY OF LITERATURE
- Course code
- LMJ440 (AF:518324 AR:321575)
- Teaching language
- English
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Academic Discipline
- L-FIL-LET/14
- Period
- 1st Semester
- Course year
- 2
- Where
- VENEZIA
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
(1) Knowledge and understanding of European literature both at expert level and from a comparative perspective
(2) Knowledge and understanding of the theoretical aspects of textual analysis covered during previous college education, and the terminology of literary theory and history in its connections with cultural history—with specific reference to the comparative history and theory of the novel
(3) Knowledge and understanding of European and American culture and literature in their historical contexts, and in relation to a literary form (the novel) and a field of theorerical research (empathy studies)
Applying Knowledge and Understanding
(1) Ability to take part in a scholarly debate on the theory and history of the novel in an expert way, speak in public, and defend a thesis
(2) Ability to act confidently in high-level professional situations and intercultural contexts requiring knowledge of European and American cultures and literatures, and ability to relate that knowledge to general and topical questions
Making Judgments
(1) Ability to develop intellectual independence with regard to the topics covered in the lectures
Communication Skills
(1) Ability to communicate orally and effectively the knowledge acquired using the correct terminology
(2) Ability to interact with peers and the teacher in a critical and respectful way both in person and in the virtual classroom
Learning Skills
(1) Ability to navigate critically the required readings and the bibliography they provide
Pre-requirements
Contents
Empathy is one of the key-concepts referred to by scholars in order to understand the particular kind of cognitive, aesthetic, and social work of the novel. By reading two novels that are able to elicit strong and qualitatively different empathic responses, Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary and Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita, and by retracing the theoretical debate on empathy from an interdisciplinary perspective (literary theory, aesthetics, psychoanalysis, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience), the course will explore the connections between empathy and the novel, and reflect upon the importance of the idea of empathy for literary studies.
Referral texts
Nabokov, Vladimir. The Annotated Lolita. 1955. Ed., intro., and nn. Alfred Appel Jr. New York: Vintage, 1991.
Maibom, Heidi L. Empathy. Londond and New York: Routledge, 2020.
Ercolino, Stefano. “Negative Empathy: History, Theory, Criticism,” Orbis Litterarum 73.3 (2018): 243-262.
Keen, Suzanne. Empathy and the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 ("Preface" and Chapters 1, 2, 3)
Instead of Suzanne Keen’s Empathy and the Novel, students of the MA program in Environmental Humanities will read the following text:
Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. New York: Routledge, 2004.
For students who do not have the possibility to complete the preparation in the classroom by following the lessons, one of the following texts is required:
Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. Demons: A Novel in Three Parts. 1871-1872. Trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Vintage, 1995.
Céline, Louis-Ferdinand. Journey to the End of the Night. 1932. Trans. Ralph Manheim. Fwd. John Banville. Intro. André Derval. Richmond: Alma Classics, 2014.
Littell, Jonathan. The Kindly Ones. 2006. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. London: Vintage, 2010.
Assessment methods
Type of exam
Grading scale
28-30L: Students master the topics presented in the course and the assigned readings; they are capable of hyerarchizing information and make use of appropriate terminology;
26-27: Students have a good knowledge of the topics presented in the course and the assigned readings; they generally succeed in hyerarchizing information and are familiar with scientific terminology;
24-25: Student do not always know thoroughly topics presented in the course and the assigned readings; their oral exposition is clear, although concepts are not always expressed through appropriate terminology;
22-23: Students have a mostly superficial knowledge of the topics presented in the course and the assigned readings; their oral exposition is not always clear and generally lacks scientific terminology;
18-21: Student have a very superficial knowledge of the topics presented in the course and the assigned readings; their oral exposition is confused and does not resort to scientific terminology.
Teaching methods
(2) In-class and online discussion