MEDIEVAL AND HUMANISTIC PHILOLOGY
- Academic year
- 2024/2025 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- FILOLOGIA MEDIEVALE E UMANISTICA SP.
- Course code
- FM0088 (AF:509028 AR:291504)
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Master's Degree Programme (DM270)
- Educational sector code
- L-FIL-LET/08
- Period
- 2nd Semester
- Where
- VENEZIA
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
The Master's degree course in Italian Philology and Literature aims at an in-depth methodological knowledge in the field of Italian literature from the Origins to the 20th century and of comparative medieval and modern literature. Within this course, the teaching of Medieval and Humanistic Philology sp., included as an optional course in the Medieval and Byzantine programme, aims to provide students with basic elements of intellectual history of the late Middle Ages and of philological technique to critically read and prepare editions of Middle Latin texts and vernacular texts in relation to Latin texts.
The intellectual history of the 13th-14th centuries will be studied through one of the most interesting cases of translation of a vernacular text into Latin, namely the Devisement dou Monde/Milione by Marco Polo and Rustichello da Pisa.
Expected learning outcomes
In terms of skills, the student will refine (1) the ability to critically elaborate the bibliography related to the topics covered in the course; (2) the ability to work on case studies through the application of methods developed in the critical literature. In this way, the following competences, consistent with the course of study, will be developed: (1) competence in the use of philological instrumentation; (2) competence in the analysis, interpretation and comprehension of the texts presented in class; (3) autonomous reflection and re-elaboration of the topics dealt with.
Pre-requirements
Contents
Through a reading by selected passages, the course intends to offer a presentation of the text starting from its manuscript tradition and the problems it poses (bi-authorship, no originals, presence of editorial variants, activism and multiple translation processes, in vernacular languages and in Latin); the specificities of some redactions will be analysed, in particular the Franco-Italian F, the Latin Z and P, and some cases of indirect tradition from the 14th and 15th centuries. Students will be asked to produce a written essay on passages selected.
Referral texts
(1) lecture notes and materials available on the moodle platform;
(2) A. Andreose, Raccontare il mondo. Storia e fortuna del Devisement dou monde di Marco Polo e Rustichello da Pisa, Alessandria, Ed. dell’Orso, 2020 (chap. 2, Il DM e il progetto editoriale di Rustichello da Pisa, pp. 5-22);
(3) Marco Polo. Storia e mito di un viaggio e di un libro, a cura di S. Simion e E. Burgio, Roma, Carocci, 2024 (chap. 1-4, 6, 8, 9).
The texts of the reference editions of "Devisement dou monde", all available in open access, will be indicated and provided in class.
Any hard-to-find text will be made available on moodle.
Assessment methods
Objectives of the assessment test: (1) to verify knowledge of the topics of the course (intellectual history; textual criticism; analysis and commentary of texts presented in class); (2) to verify the ability to reflect and rework independently on the topics covered; (3) to verify knowledge of the bibliography indicated in the syllabus. The final grade will be given in thirtieths.
In more detail, the assignment of the final grade, which will take into account the written exercise and the oral test, will be made as follows:
(1) range 27-30 cum laude: (a) good, very good or excellent knowledge of the syllabus; (b) good, very good or excellent ability to analyze texts; (c) good, very good or excellent command of philological language; good, very good or excellent ability of expression, argumentation and personal reworking;(2) range 23-26: (a) fair, but partial or disorganized knowledge of the examination syllabus; (b) fair ability to analyze texts, with uncertainties in exposition and argumentation; (c) fair command of philological language, with some imprecision in the use of the technical vocabulary of the discipline; (d) more than sufficient ability in expression and argumentation;
(3) range 18-22: (a) barely sufficient knowledge of the exam syllabus; (b) limited ability to analyze texts; (c) limited and barely sufficient expression and argumentation skills;
(4) negative assessment: little or no knowledge of the examination syllabus; (b) insufficient ability to analyze texts; (c) inadequate expression and argumentation skills.