MEDIEVAL AND HUMANISTIC LATIN SCRIPTS AND TRADITION
- Academic year
- 2024/2025 Syllabus of previous years
- Official course title
- TESTI E TRADIZIONE LATINA MEDIEVALE - UMANISTICA
- Course code
- FT0267 (AF:378862 AR:292790)
- Modality
- On campus classes
- ECTS credits
- 6
- Degree level
- Bachelor's Degree Programme
- Educational sector code
- L-FIL-LET/08
- Period
- 3rd Term
- Course year
- 3
- Where
- VENEZIA
- Moodle
- Go to Moodle page
Contribution of the course to the overall degree programme goals
Expected learning outcomes
- Knowledge of the development of medieval Latin culture;
- theoretical-methodological knowledge of the problems related to the matter.
2. Ability to apply knowledge and understanding
- Ability to critically elaborate issues related to basic literary knowledge;
- ability to apply, to concrete and specific cases, the theoretical-methodological tools learned;
- ability to analyze a literary text and place it in the correct historical-cultural context.
3. Ability of judgement
- Know how to develop a critical approach, which allows to evaluate the different interpretations and evaluations of a text and to formulate personal hypotheses.
4. Communication skills
- Know how to communicate the specificities of the subject using appropriate terminology.
5. Learning skills
- Know how to critically consult the reference texts and bibliography.
Pre-requirements
Contents
Within this very broad framework, the course will focus on the Italian area in the Middle Ages. The choice stems from the lively contemporary debate of scholars, who have identified Italian culture in the long centuries of the Central Middle Ages (VIII-XIV century) as the main vehicle for a new relationship with classical culture practiced by lay intellectuals. This relationship was formed through a long and conflictual path between different conceptions of the book, culture and language, as Ronald Witt demonstrated in the book 'L'eccezione italiana'.
The course will retrace the hypothesis of this scholar, comparing them with other important historiographical constructions (in particular those of Auerbach, Banniard, Curtius) and verifying it through a direct analysis of a rich choice of texts in Latin. The texts will be contextualized, with particular attention to their context of production, their intended use, the historical-social figure of its author and its reference milieu.
Referral texts
2. Reference text (to be studied in its entirety for the exam):
- Paolo CHIESA, La letteratura latina del medioevo. Un profilo storico, Roma, Carocci 2017.
3. Readings that will be discussed in class (a selection of pages):
- Erich AUERBACH, Lingua letteraria e pubblico nella tarda antichità latina e nel Medioevo, Milano, Feltrinelli (various editions);
- Michel BANNIARD, Viva Voce Communication écrite et communication orale du IVe au IXe siècle, Paris, IEA, 1992 (now also available in Italian translation, ed. by Lucio Cristante and Fabio Romanini, Trieste, EUT, 2020);
- Ernst Robert CURTIUS, Letteratura europea e Medio Evo latino, a cura di Roberto Antonelli, Macerata, Quodlibet, 2022 (Italian translation);
- Ronald G. WITT, L'eccezione italiana. L'intellettuale laico nel Medioevo e l'origine del Rinascimento (800-1300), Roma, Viella, 2017.
4. Recommended supplementary readings:
- Letteratura latina medievale (secoli VI-XV). Un manuale, a cura di Claudio Leonardi, Firenze, SISMEL · Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2002;
- Paolo CHIESA, La trasmissione dei testi latini. Storia e metodo critico, Roma, Carocci, 2019.
Assessment methods
Assessment criteria
27-30 cum laude: extensive knowledge of topics and methodologies learned; excellent ability to express, discuss and summarise concepts; appropriate and critical use of technical terminology.
26-23: good knowledge of topics and methodologies learned, even if marked by some imperfections in content and method; good ability to express, discuss and summarise concepts, with some uncertainty and/or inaccuracy in the use of technical terminology.
18-22: acceptable but superficial knowledge of topics and methodologies learned; limited ability to express, discuss and summarise concepts; use of technical terminology not always appropriate.
<18 (insufficient): poor knowledge of topics and methodologies learned; inadequate ability to express, discuss and summarise concepts; inappropriate use of technical terminology.