PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE (ADVANCED COURSE)

The course of Philosophy of Knowledge, of theoretical field, deals with issues related to the elaboration and criticism of the foundation of knowledge, in relation to the themes evoked by classical thought and to the outcomes of modern and contemporary philosophical reflection. The course privileges the analytic work on texts, "the strenuous effort of the Concept" and the exhibition of the speculative terms devised by the thinkers who have measured themselves with the theme of knowledge

Detailed and critical knowledge of the issues and fundamental problems of philosophy of knowledge in relation to the nodal points of the Western philosophical tradition and its developments in the contemporary debate in the larger context of the crisis of the foundations in the philosophical thought of the twentieth century

Depth knowledge of the argumentative and methodological strategies regarding the theoretical size of philosophical experience

Ability to read and interpret a philosophical text, focusing on the theoretical approach

Ability to analyze, understand and argue the reasons underlying the philosophical issues in view of a theoretical reworking, also in relation to the consequences of a practical nature

Depht knowledge of the history of philosophy, with particular regard to metaphysical themes

Severino's and Heidegger's interpretation of Anaximander.

1) Anaximander, Parmenides and Heraclitus
2) Philosophy and truth of being
3) Being and entities
4) Time and justice: kata to chreon

1.
M. Heidegger, Il detto di Anassimandro, in Id., Sentieri interrotti, La Nuova Italia, Firenze 1968, pp. 299-348.
E. Severino, La parola di Anassimandro, in Id., Essenza del nichilismo, Adelphi, Milano 19822, pp. 391-411.
E. Severino, Dike, Adelphi, Milano 2015, pp. 19-111.

2.a
- N. Cusano, Emanuele Severino. Oltre il nichilismo, Morcelliana, Brescia 2011, pp. 452-478;
- A. Stella – G. Ianulardo, La relazione come fondamento nella lettura di Anassimandro offerta da Heidegger e da Severino, “La filosofia futura”, n.8 (2017), pp. 85-97;
- G. Goggi, Sulla originarietà della relazione, “La filosofia futura”, n.9 (2017), pp. 95-122.

2.b
- P. Chiodi, Heidegger e Anassimandro: la metafisica come oblio dell’essere, “Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia”, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Maggio-Giugno 1952), pp. 161-172;
- F. Aronadio, Il senso dell’interpretazione heideggeriana di Anassimandro, “Rivista di Storia della Filosofia”, Vol. 42, No. 4 (1987), pp. 721-736;
- G. Chiurazzi, Tempo e giustizia: sulla lettura heideggeriana di Anassimandro, “Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics”, XI, 2009, 1, pp. 9-24.

For the examination, the student will have to demonstrate to:
1) know how to contextualize the themes of the course from the historical-philosophical point of view;
2) know the terminology, the fundamental concepts and the theoretical references of the texts explored by the course
3) being able to analytically reconstruct the trend of the analyzed texts, highlighting points/steps nodal and argument ways
4) grasp the outcomes of this specific approach to theme.

Lecture and seminar

Italian

The examination syllabus will be specified during the lessons.
Students who do not attend lessons are required to agree the program with the teacher.

Accessibility, Disability and Inclusion
Ca' Foscari abides by Italian Law (Law 17/1999; Law 170/2010) regarding support services and accommodation available to students with disabilities. This includes students with mobility, visual, hearing and other disabilities (Law 17/1999), and specific learning impairments (Law 170/2010). If you have a disability or impairment that requires accommodations (i.e., alternate testing, readers, note takers or interpreters) please contact the Disability and Accessibility Offices in Student Services: disabilita@unive.it.

oral

This subject deals with topics related to the macro-area "Human capital, health, education" and contributes to the achievement of one or more goals of U. N. Agenda for Sustainable Development